Browsing by Subject "biosimilar"
Now showing items 1-3 of 3
-
(2019)Biological medicines are gaining ground in drug therapy. However, biological medicines are considerably expensive. Top ten drugs that caused the most drug reimbursement expenses included six biological drugs in Finland in 2017. A biosimilar is a biological medicine which is highly similar to another biological medicine (the reference medicine) that has already approved. Biosimilar prices are cheaper than the original medicines because their clinical development program does not have to be as extensive. A wide use of biosimilars save costs for both the patient and society without changing the effectiveness of drug therapy. The aim of this study is to investigate the automatic substitution of biological drugs containing the same active ingredient, especially from the point of view of medication safety. The study was conducted as a systematic literature review. Literature search was carried out by using Pubmed and Scopus databases. The literature was also searched manually from references of the articles and from the industry experts. The literature search produced a total of 454 articles after the deletion of duplicates. A title, abstract and full text screening was conducted by two independent researchers. All in all, 65 articles met the inclusion criteria of the study. As no studies were found on the automatic substitution of biological medicines from the point of view of medication safety, it was decided to include in the study original studies investigating the substitution of biological drugs from the point of view of doctors (n=8), pharmacists (n=3), patients (n=1) and various stakeholders (n=2). The original studies were all surveys except one study. In addition, the review included statements of various medical associations and organizations (n=23), descriptive reviews (n=27), and expert views (n=2) on the automatic substitution of biological drugs. According to the results of the original studies (n=13), it can be stated that automatic substitution is not considered generally acceptable. Doctors consider it is very important that the pharmacist informs them if substitution occurs. They also think it’s critical that doctors should be able to prevent substitution. Patients are also sceptical about the substitution of biological drugs. The quality of the original studies was assessed by the generalizability of the research results. The generalizability of the results of the original studies is weak due to the methodological shortcomings of the studies. Although the automatic substitution of biological drugs is legal in some countries, such as in France and in Australia, it has not been studied from the point of view of medication safety. In order to be safe to implement automatic substitution of biological medicines, more should be investigated on the subject. From the point of view of medication safety, healthcare professionals and patients will need further target group education on biosimilars. In addition, it should be clarified what kind of education the healthcare professionals and patients would need if the automatic substitution of biological medicines was to be realized.
-
(2018)This is a systematic review aiming to investigate the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of biosimilars in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. Biosimilar drugs used to treat inflammatory bowel diseases include biosimilar infliximab and biosimilar adalimumab. Biosimilar infliximab has been authorized by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2013 and by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2016. Biosimilar adalimumab has been authorized by EMA and FDA in 2017 and, at the time the literary search for this systematic review was conducted no studies were found regarding the treatment of adalimumab biosimilar for inflammatory bowel diseases. To acquire marketing authorization for biosimilars, it must be proven that the biosimilar is biologically similar to the original medicinal product. Bioequivalence is demonstrated through physicochemical trials and clinical trials. However, clinical trials do not have to be performed with all of the indications for which the original medical product is registered. After proving bioequivalence with one or more indication it is possible to extrapolate the biosimilar to be used in all of the original medical products indications. This has raised the question of whether biosimilars are really comparable to the originator in indications for which no clinical trials have been conducted. This systematic review was implemented using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews and Interventions. Systematic literature searches were made in Cochrane, Medline (Ovid®), PubMed and Scopus databases on 12.05.2017. 14 observational studies, one systematic review and a randomized clinical trial that met the inclusion criteria were included in the systematic review. The quality of the publications was evaluated using the STROBE-, NOS- and CONSORT-checklists and information regarding the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of biosimilars was extracted. CD-patients receiving tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors for the first time, the clinical response was achieved in 50.0 % to 97.2 % of patients depending on patient population and the duration of treatment. Similarly, for UC-patients, the clinical response was achieved in 62.2 % to 100.0 %. The clinical remission was achieved among 28.9 % to 84.4 % of CD-patients and among 28.9 % to 84.4 % of UC-patients, depending on patient population and treatment follow-up. After the switch from original infliximab to biosimilar, the proportion of patients in clinical remission during follow-up ranged from 62.3 % to 100.0 % in CD-patients and from 45.5 % to 100.0 % in UC-patients. Clinical remission was sustained throughout the whole follow-up in 70 % to 100 % of CD-patients and 66.7 % to 92.0 % of UC-patients. The incidence of adverse events leading to the discontinuation of drug treatment was between 0.0 % and 25.0 %, and the incidence of all adverse events ranged from 0.0 % to 93.6 % in CD- and UC-patients. Biosimilar infliximab seems to be comparable to the original product regarding the efficacy, effectiveness and safety. This result is supported by the systematic literature review published earlier. Conducting a meta-analysis of the information contained in this systematic literature review could have led to a more final decision considering efficacy, effectiveness and safety of biosimilar-infliximab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases.
-
Comparison of The U.S. and Finnish pharmaceutical markets and their impact on health care spending (2020)Theoretical framework: The consolidated pharmaceutical market is becoming increasingly global and the same international pharmaceutical companies operate around the world in different countries, responsible for drug development and production. The high costs of developing novel medicines and the motive for higher profits has led to elevating price level of pharmaceuticals and health care services. Finland and the U.S. offer two extremes at the pharmaceutical market. The pharmaceutical market field in Finland is very structural and rigid, and medicine prices are regulated by law. In the U.S. the prices are based on the laws of supply and demand and the prices differ by different states, retailers and insurance policies. A small-scale longitudal price comparison is also reviewed to showcase the effect of continuously rising medicine prices. Study objective: The idea of this study is to describe and compare pricing mechanisms of pharmaceuticals and price differences between two very different market structures and review how these might affect the cost-effectiveness of national health care spending. These divergences are also mirrored to survey recent global pharmaceutical market problems such as drug shortages, possibly due to less appealing markets of higher price regulation policies. Materials and methods: Price data were collected from national, official, open-source databases. National health care expenditure and comparison to GDP was collected from publications by the OECD. All monetary values have been presented in both currencies (EUR and USD) to present more comparable values. Results: When compared to other OECD-countries the U.S. spent distinctly the largest amount of funds on health care per capita. Finland’s national health care costs were thousand times minor in total spending and less than a half per capita when compared to those of the U.S. With lower expenditure Finland manages to offer access to public, government-funded health insurance program. Meanwhile the prices of prescription medicines in Finland have decreased significantly, the prices for have continuously elevated in the U.S. Conclusions: The outcome of this study is that free markets and a complex supply chain, compared to more regulated markets with more transparency, have higher overall price level in pharmaceuticals and health care services. Free markets and sufficient intellectual property rights are more enticing to pharmaceutical companies. They promote new innovations and developing of much-needed novel therapies to modern health problems, such as AIDS and the global threat of worsening situation of antibiotic resistance. More regulated markets may create problems such as drug shortages and are often considered complex and less appealing market systems due to high level of administrative work but conserve the cost-effectiveness of the use of public funds.
Now showing items 1-3 of 3