Browsing by Subject "esimies"

Goals. This master's thesis research was aiming at discovering from interaction between the employee and supervisor, the kind of information that will increase the use of protective equipment (PPE) and improve safety in the construction site. The study examined the meanings that the supervisors associate with PPE, as well as situations in which a manager should point out the employee to use protective equipment. Methods. This qualitative research belongs to socio-cultural communication research tradition. This speech communication study was carried out from the perspective of ethnography of communication. The study included five semi-structured interviews, 8 video recordings from construction sites, an online discussion, observation notes from 16 different construction work situations, as well as 10 journal articles, including photographs. The method of analysis was the cultural discourse analysis (CUDA). It was used to study how managers produce meanings related to the use of protective equipment in interaction. The concept of relational work was used to study the interaction between the supervisor and the employee from the supervisor's point of view. Results and conclusions. The study showed that employee's objections to the use of protective equipment carry a strong cultural message. The study also showed two different cultural ways of speech, "getting involved" and "taking notice". The main differences were with the meanings related to the use of protective equipment and the interaction with employees. "Getting involved": managers linked the PPE with a lot of different meanings, many of which were negative. For example, PPE prevented working or the use of PPE was considered unmanly. They perceived that reminding about the use of PPE was negatively marked, impolite and inappropriate. "Taking notice" managers related the PPE with professionalism and safety. They also perceived that reminding about the use of PPE was unmarked or positively marked, polite and appropriate. The results can be utilized in helping the interaction between the manager and the employee associated with the PPE.

Goals. My goal in this study is to find out what kinds of views superiors have of giving feed-back. I believe that superiors give feedback, but I want to discover what it takes for them in their opinions as a manager. Earlier studies show that giving feedback has an impact on a sub-ordinates motivation and wellbeing at work. My research dilemmas are what kind of views su-periors have on giving feedback to subordinates and what prerequisites does it require for them to give feedback. Methodology. The study was up of qualitative semi-structured theme based interviews. I inter-viewed three superiors who worked at multinational enterprises. All of the superiors have worked as superiors for a long time and have multiple subordinates. After the interviews, I transcribed the materials after which I started to form the themes based on it. After forming the themes, I was able to write down the results under appropriate themes. Results and conclusions. The key findings of my study was that giving feedback is based on interaction. Superiors had a challenge giving constructive feedback, but they acknowledged how important it is in in their work. While giving feedback, you have to pay attention to word choice, as it plays a critical role in how the subordinates understand the feedback. By interacting superiors can build a relationship of mutual trust with their subordinate, which aids the superior in giving feedback.