Skip to main content
Login | Suomeksi | På svenska | In English

Stronger together? : The Danish Realm as discussed in Danish parliamentary debates 2014–2018

Show simple item record 2019-06-13T09:03:47Z 2019-06-13T09:03:47Z 2019-06-13
dc.title Stronger together? : The Danish Realm as discussed in Danish parliamentary debates 2014–2018 en
ethesis.discipline.URI none
ethesis.faculty Valtiotieteellinen tiedekunta fi
ethesis.faculty Faculty of Social Sciences en
ethesis.faculty Statsvetenskapliga fakulteten sv
ethesis.faculty.URI Helsingin yliopisto fi University of Helsinki en Helsingfors universitet sv
dct.creator Nukarinen, Mira
dct.issued 2019
dct.language.ISO639-2 eng
dct.abstract The unity of the Realm is the political construction comprising of Denmark, Faroe Islands and Greenland. In 2013 the Danish Parliament decided to establish an annual debate dedicated entirely to the discussion of matters concerning the Danish Realm – a unique opportunity for politicians to gather and discuss the Realm in its entirety, not just Greenlandic or Faroese matters respectively. The analysed material consists of five parliamentary debates, one from each year from 2014 to 2018 since the establishment of the annual debate. This study looks at what topics were discussed during these debates and how the Danish Realm was understood and contested in different ways. The first part of the study covers the debates and the most occurring topics that arose from the material. Using critical discourse analysis, the second part analyses how the main concepts and terminology was used, how the politicians used language in different ways and how different aspects of the Danish Realm were framed. The findings show that similar topics occurred throughout the debates, and that there was no significant difference in what the parties deemed as important topics. The Danish Realm was discussed and framed in very different ways and it was evident that the concept of the Realm means very different things to all of its three members. These varying ideas of what the Realm is, and should be, were contested in the discussions. The proportionately large focus on the independence question and the Arctic, as well as the findings from the discourse analysis demonstrate that Denmark wishes to maintain the Realm as it is to be able to continue its role as an arctic actor, to which especially Greenlandic independence could possibly be a hindrance. The Faroese and Greenlandic politicians displayed discontent with the way the Realm is constructed today and pointed out the need for structural changes. en
dct.subject greenland
dct.subject denmark
dct.subject danish realm
dct.subject faroe islands
dct.subject arctic
dct.subject framing
dct.subject critical discourse analysis
dct.language en
ethesis.language englanti fi
ethesis.language English en
ethesis.language engelska sv
ethesis.supervisor Strang, Johan
ethesis.supervisor Stadius, Peter
ethesis.thesistype pro gradu -tutkielmat fi
ethesis.thesistype master's thesis en
ethesis.thesistype pro gradu-avhandlingar sv
dct.identifier.ethesis E-thesisID:57a61724-6ee0-45b1-8074-0d9f38eee9d2
ethesis-internal.timestamp.reviewStep 2019-05-15 17:05:44:463
dct.identifier.urn URN:NBN:fi:hulib-201906132846
dc.type.dcmitype Text
ethesis.facultystudyline Samhällsvetenskaper fi
ethesis.facultystudyline Social Sciences en
ethesis.facultystudyline Samhällsvetenskaper sv
ethesis.mastersdegreeprogram Nyky-yhteiskunnan tutkimuksen maisteriohjelma fi
ethesis.mastersdegreeprogram Master's Programme in (European and Nordic Studies) en
ethesis.mastersdegreeprogram Magisterprogrammet i moderna samhällen sv

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Nukarinen_Mira_pro_gradu_2019.pdf 1.431Mb PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record