Skip to main content
Login | Suomeksi | På svenska | In English

Challenging the misconception of states : states can avoid human rights responsibilities through externalized migration control practices

Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-14T12:16:04Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-14T12:16:04Z
dc.date.issued 2021-01-14
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/33971
dc.title Challenging the misconception of states : states can avoid human rights responsibilities through externalized migration control practices en
ethesis.discipline Kansainvälinen oikeus fi
ethesis.discipline International law en
ethesis.discipline Folkrätt sv
ethesis.discipline.URI http://data.hulib.helsinki.fi/id/74580cd9-268b-449d-857f-ece9f295cc69 und
ethesis.faculty Oikeustieteellinen tiedekunta fi
ethesis.faculty Faculty of Law en
ethesis.faculty Juridiska fakulteten sv
ethesis.faculty.URI http://data.hulib.helsinki.fi/id/5a29ad0e-46f3-4834-92a6-4a95699cc1e8
ethesis.university.URI http://data.hulib.helsinki.fi/id/50ae46d8-7ba9-4821-877c-c994c78b0d97
ethesis.university Helsingin yliopisto fi
ethesis.university University of Helsinki en
ethesis.university Helsingfors universitet sv
dct.creator Graae, Mikaela
dct.issued 2020
dct.language.ISO639-2 eng
dct.abstract International refugee law is forced to adapt to the increase of externalized migration control. States no longer stick to migration control only at their national borders. Especially developed states have introduced various externalized migration control mechanisms – seeking to control the movement of migrants at every step of their journey. By such externalization, states aim to deter unwanted migrants. The presumption behind these practices is that through them, states can avoid the legal responsibilities that flow from international refugee law and especially the principle of non-refoulement. The enforcement of such practices often results in weakened protection for refugees. The control mechanisms are designed so that migrants are effectively denied access to areas where their rights would otherwise be substantially better than in those where they are forced to stay. The thesis deals with these mechanisms as conscious and strategic decisions made by developed states to keep unwanted migrants outside their legal responsibility. The overall objective of the thesis is to challenges the presumption of states, that they can evade responsibilities by outsourcing migration control to other states. It does so by analyzing the current legal regime on the extraterritorial application of non-refoulement and state jurisdiction. The question it answers is thus, when, if ever, does extraterritorial jurisdiction and state responsibility apply if externalized migration control mechanisms have been enforced? The thesis concludes that, although externalized migration control has become the rule rather than the exception, the current legal regime does not provide comprehensive protection for refugees. Extraterritorial jurisdiction under human rights law relies on effective control over territories or individuals; because externalized migration control mechanisms often outsource the control to third states, the jurisdictional link cannot necessarily be established between the individual and the state that enforces such mechanisms. Therefore, to protect refugees effectively the thesis argues that a contemporary understanding of the rules on extraterritorial jurisdiction should be adopted. It argues that states’ reliance on externalized migration control mechanisms can be challenged by adopting an additional basis for jurisdiction – jurisdiction based on the exercise of public powers abroad. It would decrease the attractiveness of externalized practices and increase the likelihood that states commit to fulfill them in a way that respects and guarantees protection for refugees. en
dct.subject Externalized migration control
dct.subject non-entrée practices
dct.subject non-refoulement
dct.subject extraterritorial jurisdiction
dct.subject international refugee law
dct.language en
ethesis.language.URI http://data.hulib.helsinki.fi/id/languages/eng
ethesis.language englanti fi
ethesis.language English en
ethesis.language engelska sv
ethesis.thesistype pro gradu -tutkielmat fi
ethesis.thesistype master's thesis en
ethesis.thesistype pro gradu-avhandlingar sv
ethesis.thesistype.URI http://data.hulib.helsinki.fi/id/thesistypes/mastersthesis
dct.identifier.ethesis E-thesisID:224156d1-98a2-4108-96bb-791e42076fab
ethesis-internal.timestamp.reviewStep 2020-11-20 21:21:57:276
dct.identifier.urn URN:NBN:fi:hulib-202101141167
dc.type.dcmitype Text
ethesis.facultystudyline.URI none und
ethesis.mastersdegreeprogram.URI none und

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Graae_Mikaela_thesis_2020.pdf 745.5Kb PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record