Skip to main content
Login | Suomeksi | På svenska | In English

Browsing by Subject "callous-unemotional"

Sort by: Order: Results:

  • Laivonen, Petra (2021)
    Goals. Traditional research argues that the main mechanism underlying children’s callous-unemotional (CU) traits is impaired affective empathy. However, recent research suggests that the core characteristic among children with CU traits may be, instead, impaired cognitive empathy. As understanding the underlying mechanisms of CU traits is essential in implementing effective interventions, these findings provide a new important viewpoint to the study of CU traits in general and to the development of effective interventions. Drawing on this, this thesis discusses whether cognitive empathy can be learned and when and how to intervene most effectively. Methods. Literature search was conducted via PubMed, Ovid Medline and Google Scholar by using search words such as “callous-unemotional”, “CU traits”, “cognitive empathy”, “emotion recognition”, “parenting intervention”, “emotion recognition intervention” and “preventive interventions”. Results and conclusions. General view in literature regarding the relationship between empathy deficits and CU traits is still inconsistent: there are studies suggesting both cognitive and affective empathy deficits as the core characteristic of CU traits. Interpreting findings of studies assessing intervention effectiveness is challenging, partly because these studies rarely measure intervention effectiveness directly on empathy, and, even more rarely, on cognitive empathy. Thus, as some findings are promising in the context of, for example, prosocial behavior and conduct disorder, making further conclusions about their effectiveness on cognitive empathy needs to be made with caution. Broad range of definitions used of cognitive empathy and various assessment methods used to measure empathy increase the complexity of the issue further. The importance and effectiveness of early identification and intervening is, however, broadly acknowledged. As empathy, CU traits and problematic behavior are extremely complex constructs, it is reasonable to consider whether it is effective, or even possible, to intervene cognitive empathy as such, or whether interventions focusing on underlying endophenotypes, such as environmental factors, would prove to be more effective. What is clear is that more research around this complex, yet critically important, theme is needed.
  • Rovamo, Eeva (2019)
    Objectives. Psychopaths have frequently been regarded as untreatable or even made worse by treatment. Psychopathy has also been linked to substance use disorders; however, little research has been conducted regarding how psychopathic traits impact the treatment of substance use problems. The purpose of the current study was to determine whether psychopathic traits in severe juvenile offenders interact with substance use treatment effectiveness. Specifically, this study examined whether psychopathic traits, including grandiose-manipulative, callous-unemotional and impulsive-irresponsible traits moderate treatment gains measured as a decrease in problematic substance use. It was hypothesised that grandiose-manipulative and callous-unemotional traits would interact with treatment effect. Method. The study sample consisted of 472 participants from a larger, criminogenic longitudinal study of juveniles convicted of severe offences (The Pathways to Desistance –study). This subsample included participants who received treatment for substance abuse during one or more follow-up periods. Participants were between the ages 14 and 17 and were recruited between 2000-2003. Each participant was followed for 6.5 years as they moved from adolescence to young adulthood. General linear mixed models were used to examine whether treatment, psychopathic traits, time and their interaction would predict reported substance use problems. Results and conclusions. Treatment was effective in reducing problematic substance use among juvenile offenders. Contrary to set hypotheses, none of the psychopathic traits moderated treatment effect. Unexpectedly, all psychopathic traits were negatively associated with problematic substance use. The findings suggest that treatment was successful in reducing substance use problems regardless of psychopathic traits and that these traits could to some extent act as protective factors against substance abuse. Though these preliminary findings are encouraging, future research employing a more rigorous study-design is needed before stronger conclusion can be made.