Skip to main content
Login | Suomeksi | På svenska | In English

Browsing by Author "Aschan, Tuulevi P."

Sort by: Order: Results:

  • Aschan, Tuulevi P. (2020)
    The study examines the manifestation of dignity and the relationship between dignity and survival in the documentary “Autolla Nepaliin – Unelmien elokuva” and in the charity project which was described in the documentary. As the project had achieved its aims, it was considered a success. The material used was the speech of the documentary, transcribed to text. The speakers were the project team as well as people who had experienced comparable issues as the project team. The study represented a qualitative research method. The material was analyzed by the means of theory-based content analysis. The study was based on self-determination theory, which claims person succeeds and feels better when psychological needs, ie autonomy, competence and relatedness are met (Ryan & Deci 2000, 68.) From the theory Martela (2015, 37–54) has derived the concept of the motivational diamond used in the study. It is divided into dignity and survival. Survival consists of acceptance and status as well as safety and resources. Relevance requires the realization of relatedness, contribution (doing good), competence and autonomy. Most observations were made of relatedness, which was evident in the four circles: insiders, related people, project-connected circle, and random people circle. Doing good turned out to be a planned dream of volunteering. Autonomy permeated the entire project and was reflected in ideas, enthusiasm and patient work. Alongside autonomy, responsibility emerged. Competence was realized as learning and development, as well as identifying skills, sources of strengths and barriers. Most of the survival material was related to safety and resources resources, including travel progress, equipment and health. Acceptance and status were realized in social media approvals which affected the accumulation of money. Emotions determined the relationship between dignity and survival, forming a dialogue between them. The project serves as a metaphor for working life projects and their success. It is necessary to identify and define the circles of relatedness, to consider the development of competence, the manifestation of autonomy and the possibilities of contribution. Although funders approve goals defining the project work, it is also worth setting a goal that is relevant to oneself. This also supports the achievement of the official goals.