Skip to main content
Login | Suomeksi | På svenska | In English

Browsing by Subject "energiansaannin ajoittuminen"

Sort by: Order: Results:

  • Maukonen, Mirkka (2015)
    Introduction: Individuals differ by their circadian rhythms from extreme morning types to extreme evening types, referred to as chronotypes. Evening types tend to consume unhealthier foods and nutrients which may predispose them at higher risk of obesity as compared to the morning types. Recently it has been suggested that food timing may play a role in weight regulation. However, the association between chronotype, food timing and obesity is not well known. Study aims: The aim of this study was to describe energy and macronutrient intake timing by chronotypes, especially the intakes by 10 a.m. and after 8 p.m. and the differences between weekdays and weekends. In addition the association between energy intake timing and obesity was investigated. Materials and methods: The study population included 847 subjects aged 25-74 years from the National FINRISK 2007 and FINDIET 2007 studies. Of the participants 293 were evening, 308 intermediate and 248 morning types, based on validated Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire. Diet was assessed using 48-hour recalls and 3-day food logs. Statistical analyses were conducted using general linear model, logistic regression and Mann-Whitney’s U-test. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, education, smoking, leisure-time physical activity and sleep duration. Results: Evening types had later energy and macronutrient intake timing than the morning types. Evening types had 400 kJ lower total energy intake by 10 a.m. and 500 kJ higher total energy intake after 8 p.m. as compared to the morning types (p<0.001). Significant differences in macronutrient intake timing was found at the weekend. By 10 a.m. evening types had less sugar, fiber, fat, saturated fat and protein than the morning types (p<0.05). After 8 p.m evening types had more carbohydrates, sugar and fiber than the morning types (p<0.05). Higher energy intake after 8 p.m. was associated with obesity in the evening types but not in the morning types. The evening types who had more than 16% of their daily energy intake after 8 p.m. were twice as likely to be obese as compared to those evening types who had less than 16% of their daily energy intake after 8 p.m. (odds ratio 2.13, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.17). Conclusions: Chronotype was associated with food timing. Evening types had later energy and macronutrient intake timing than the morning types. By 10 a.m. and after 8 p.m. most significant differences were found in energy intake. Macronutrient intake timing differed at the weekend. Higher energy intake after 8 p.m. was associated with obesity in the evening types. Higher energy intake after 8 p.m. may put especially the evening types at higher risk of obesity. However, the cross-sectional design cannot reveal causality and therefore this hypothesis require further studying.