Skip to main content
Login | Suomeksi | På svenska | In English

Browsing by Subject "adherenssi"

Sort by: Order: Results:

  • Huhtanen, Elina (2023)
    Nonadherence has been a challenge in health care since ancient times, and it is still a major source of poor therapeutic outcomes today. Various theories and theoretical models have been applied to explain adherence. So far no single theory or theoretical model has proved comprehensive, and the effects of various interventions applied have been limited. Theorizing of adherence is still incomplete. The aim of this study was to review the theoretical background of adherence so far, and to find the commonalities in theories and theoretical models, but also to discover possible trends in them. Study material comprised 20 theories and theoretical models. Material was found in reference books and documents with an aspect of adherence. Inclusion criteria involved adult outpatients with chronic diseases, excluding any special groups such as pregnant women. Emphasis was on the relevance of the theory, but comprehensive time span as well as various theory views were also considered. A chronological order was created. A qualitative content analysis was conducted, where phrases describing essential theory contents were categorised into distinctive classes. The incidence of classes and the possible trends of the incidence were analysed. Five classes emerged as commonalities in majority of the theories: Patient factors; sociocultural factors; motivation; phrases that referred to a behavioral view; and cognitive processes. Factors that diminished towards this day were the pivotality of cognitive processes in theory, and the subjective view of the health threat. Several factors were found to increase towards present-day theories and models: phrases that described the individual’s agency, such as self-efficacy or empowerment, concrete expressions of the individual’s abilities, skills and actual opportunity to the desired behavior, phrases that consisted of behavior being a function of its context or environment, and phrases where multifaceted intervention or tailoring the intervention according to the change process phase were considered. The commonalities found in the material reflect its emphasis on psychological behavior theories. The changes reflect the shift in how the patient’s agency is viewed in a patient care relationship. Newer theories also amplify the importance of viewing health behavior change as a series of phases. To achieve patient-centered care, these aspects create an increasing demand to health care professionals’ proficiency in how they encounter their patients. Moreover, there is an important signal for future intervention development in the form of a shift into multifaceted interventions and a system approach. Furthermore, a trend exists from using more general and abstract theories to a more concrete and applied approach. In the future, it is probably more fruitful to pursue knowledge-based and validated models and guidelines that are applicable to practice instead of aiming at developing a comprehensive universal theoretical approach.
  • Korhonen, Pia (2023)
    Purpose: Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is treated with daily injections of growth hormone (GH). Daily injections may cause burden to patients and to family, that may decrease treatment adherence and may result poor treatment outcome. The aim of this study was to study growth hormone treatment burden in Finland and to identify possible treatment challenges and what preferences caregivers have for growth hormone treatment (GHT). Research methods and data: Anonymous semi-structured survey was conducted in 50 pharmacies across Finland. Potential responders were identified when they came to buy growth hormone product and they were requested to complete the survey with tablet computer. Survey consisted of questions including subject characteristics, treatment background, parent satisfaction to treatment, treatment expectations, decision-making process, compliance and non-compliance reasons, and parent preferences. Survey was conducted between June 2021 and April 2022. Results: Total 79 persons responded to survey. All responders were satisfied with current treatment, 79.5% were very satisfied and 29.5% were quite satisfied. 25.6% responded that they don’t have any challenges with the treatment and 74.4% reported at least one challenge. Most common challenges were injection (35.9%), storage requirements (35.8%) and high price (16.7%). Most common reasons for missing a dose were travel or sleep overs (57.7%), forgot to take medicine (30.8%) and medicine runs out (19.8%). Parents described best and most effective GHT in their own words to be with less frequent dosing (25.6%), storage in room temperature (24.4%) and easy-to use device (23.1%). Conclusions: All caregivers were satisfied with the treatment. However nearly 75% of the responders identified treatment-related challenges. The most frequently reported challenge was the mode of administration (injection). When describing optimal GHT, the wish for less frequent dosing interval was the most often mentioned. Data from this survey can provide support in selection the optimal type of GHT for pediatric and adolescent patients.