Browsing by Subject "tulehduksellinen suolistosairaus"

For their good clinical value and supply the use of biological medicines has increased in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, biological medicines are often more expensive compared to traditional small molecule medicines. More inexpensive biosimilars, shown to be clinically equal to the corresponding biological original products, can be used to reduce medication costs as part of rational pharmacotherapy. Although patients’ perceptions about biosimilars may affect the treatment adherence and outcomes of the use of these medicines, only a few studies have been published on this area. The primary aim of the study was to study IBD patients’ perceptions of the features of biosimilars and biosimilars’ suitability for their own treatment. The secondary aim was to study biological medicine users’ perceptions of the suitability of biosimilar switch by a physician for their own treatment. In addition, sources of medicines information of the users of biological medicines were studied. The data of the study were based on a cross-sectional survey conducted by the University Pharmacy and University of Helsinki in January 2021. Research Newsletter and response link were delivered per an email to University Pharmacy’s loyal customers and electronically communicated via the Association of Rheumatism and the Association of IBD and other intestinal diseases. The study comprised of the responses of adult outpatients with IBD (n=979) who were using original biological medicines (n=120), biosimilars (n=30) or traditional small molecule medicines (n=829) (medicine user groups). The sum variables constructed by factor analysis based on the study aims were used as outcome variables. Differences between medicine user groups and the effects of other background variables were analyzed by bivariate and multivariate analysis using SPSS Statistics software. Most of the patients (70–97 % depending on the medicine user group) trusted biosimilars’ features to be equal to the corresponding original biological medicines. However, more than half of the patients (53–67%) did not know whether they would like to physician to prescribe biosimilar to them rather than the original biological medicine. Of the users of original biological medicines, 71 % did not want to be switched to a biosimilar if the current medication was working well. Biosimilar users had more positive perceptions about biosimilars and switching compared to other medicine user groups. Physician’s perception played an important role in biologic switching. Several factors that may affect perceptions about the features of biosimilars and their use in patient’s own treatment were identified. These included, in particular, previous user experience with biosimilars and having information about them. Overall, patients had positive perceptions about the features of biosimilars but had uncertainties about the use of biosimilars, especially, for the treatment of their own disease and when switching medication. More research is needed on the perceptions among different patient groups, and on the need and optimal form of medication information on biological medicines, biosimilars and their switching.