Skip to main content
Login | Suomeksi | På svenska | In English

Browsing by Subject "Yhteisopettajuus"

Sort by: Order: Results:

  • Krohn, Siiri (2024)
    The goals: The aim of this study is to examine primary school teachers' perceptions of inclusion, co-teaching, and their interconnections. The study aims to explore teachers' understanding of the meaning of inclusion, their experiences with co-teaching, and the factors that they perceive to influence co-teaching and the implementation of inclusion. The goal is to determine the impact that teachers perceive co-teaching to have on the realization of inclusion. Methods: For the study, Finnish primary school teachers (N=10) were interviewed. The interviews were conducted as semi-structured thematic interviews and were held remotely using various video call services. One interview was conducted as a paired interview, and the remaining eight were individual interviews. The data was analyzed using phenomenographic analysis. Results and conclusions: According to the teachers' perceptions, successful co-teaching has positive effects on the implementation of inclusion. From the students' perspective, co-teaching was seen as beneficial. Students felt supported from the perspective of multiple adults, instruction was more individualized, and their needs were addressed more quickly compared to teaching alone. The ability to identify the need for support and find effective learning methods for individuals was also highlighted as a benefit of co- teaching. In co-teaching, instruction was flexible and adapted well to the student population. The allocation of adult time and resources was perceived to be better for individual students or smaller groups compared to teaching alone. Assessment was also seen as more objective when multiple teachers were involved. Successful co-teaching was also found to lighten teachers' workload and support professional development. However, co-teaching requires certain prerequisites. The study resulted in three different understandings of inclusion that influenced teachers' practices. These understandings were: inclusion as a cost-saving measure, inclusion as a phenomenon of equality, and inclusion as a phenomenon similar to integration. These understandings appeared in the data as separate, overlapping, and intertwined. The results of the study provided indications that positively perceived co-teaching supported the implementation of inclusion, while neutrally or negatively perceived co-teaching weakened the conditions for inclusion. However, due to the relatively small data and the focus mainly on positive co-teaching experiences, reliable conclusions cannot be drawn.
  • Höglund, Mirjami (2024)
    The aim of this thesis is understand the perception´s of special early childhood teacher´s and early childhood teacher´s regarding co-teaching in integrated special group´s. The purpose of this study was to form overall picture of the benefit´s and challenge´s of co-teaching based on perception´s of these teacher´s in integrated special group´s , through three research question´s. The first research question aimed to determine the co-teaching practice´s or method´s utilized by special early childhood teacher´s and early childhood teacher´s in inclusive early childhood education within integrated special education group´s. The second research question focused on identifying the factor´s that special early childhood teacher´s and early childhood teacher´s perceive as facilitating co-teaching in integrated special education group´s. The third question examined the factor´s that special early childhood teacher´s and early childhood teacher´s perceive as hindering co-teaching in integrated special education group´s. The theoretical section of the thesis consists of defining the concept of inclusion and reviewing previous research literature related to inclusive early childhood education, co-teaching model´s, and multiprofessional collaboration. The study was qualitative and the philosophical approach was phenomenological. Data was collected through remotely organized semi-structured theme interview´s conducted as individual interview´s. Six special early childhood teacher´s and four early childhood teacher´s participated. Data was analyzed using both abductive and inductive content analysis The research result are examined in three section according to the research question´s. The first section discusses the model´s of co-teaching used by the teacher´s in integrated special group´s within inclusive early childhood education. Co-teaching was utilized following the co-teaching model´s implemented in basic education and based on comprehensive interaction. The co-teaching between special early childhood teacher´s and early childhood teacher´s was perceived as promoting inclusion. In the second section result examines factor´s that support co-teaching and third section addresses factor´s that do not support co-teaching in integrated special group´s. Shared planning and discussion time between special early education teacher and the early childhood teacher was seen as a crucial supporting factor for co-teaching. However, teacher´s found this planning and discussion time to be insufficient and too sporadic. The quality of interaction and collaboration between the teacher´s was also seen as both a supporting and challenging. factors for co-teaching. Based on the finding´s, it can be concluded that co-teaching between special early childhood teacher´s and early childhood teacher´s supports inclusive early childhood education in integrated special group´s. The teacher´s described co-teaching as full-time pedagogy, which emphasized sharing idea´s between teacher´s in multiprofessional collaboration. However, the models of co-teaching are not widely utilized, and the roles of teacher´s are often too fixed. Regular scheduling of planning and discussion time among teacher´s is necessary to maximize the benefits of co-teaching.
  • Vistbacka, Niina (2023)
    The purpose of this study was to find the methods of co-teaching between a craft teacher and a class teacher and the benefits and challenges for joint planning and evaluation. Co-teaching is increasing all the time, and with each use, the school wants the teacher to be ready for co-teaching with another teacher. According to the curriculum (Pops 2014), school operations should be multidisciplinary and, in accordance with the students' interests, teaching should be communal. The co-teaching of a classroom teacher and a craft teacher has not been researched terribly yet, I see that a pilot study like this is important so that the possibility of different kinds of joint work can be seen as part of everyday school life. Previous studies related to co-teaching have shown that co-teaching diversifies planning and eases the teacher's workload in challenging conditions. Studies have also shown that the strengths of both teachers add to the teaching, which would not be there when teaching alone. Teachers can share responsibility for teaching according to their own strengths. Two teachers are participating in my research, one was a craft teacher, and the other was a class teacher, a craft teacher, who work as co-teachers in the elementary school in Uusimaa in the school year 2021-2022. The interview was conducted remotely in early 2022. The interviewees were interviewed together, and they answered together. The small amount of data is justified by the pilot nature of the study. The research showed that co-teaching is perceived as a way of working as a teacher that makes one's own work easier. In particular, the workload related to planning work and evaluation was eased by working together. More insight into issues supported in their tasks both in planning and in evaluating challenging student situations. The cooperation between the classroom teacher and the craft teacher is seen as a fact and as a way of working that eases the teacher's workload. The support of a colleague and solving the issue together increases the teacher's ability to cope and brings the strengths of both teachers to the teaching.
  • Helke, Sirkku (2023)
    Objectives. Finland has been moving towards an inclusive education policy for a long time and the new curriculum from 2016 requires the school to develop in line with the principle of inclusion. This means that special schools and classes will be abolished, and special education should be organised as part of general education. However, the heterogeneity of classes brings its own challenges to the classroom and teachers experience challenges in performing their work, which is reflected in the quality of teaching. It is therefore important to explore what different ways can be found to address these challenges, and one option could be co-teaching. In previous studies, teachers have found that co-teaching is a good way of working, supporting pupils’ learning, making teachers’ work more meaningful, and reducing workload. The aim of this study was to find out what pupils’ experiences of the benefits and challenges of co-teaching are, and what they consider requirements for effective co-teaching. Methods. I obtained my data by interviewing nine 6th grade pupils who were studying in a co-educational class. I conducted the interviews using the thematic interview method. My research was a qualitative study using a phenomenographic research analysis model to explore the different ways in which students experienced learning in a co-taught classroom. Results and conclusions. Students associated five different benefits with co-teaching: easier access to support, the possibility of small group teaching, good group management and working in peace, flexible working methods, and the combined expertise of two teachers. There were four challenges of co-teaching: disruption of teaching, becoming more alienated from the other teacher, scheduling challenges in teaching, and the pupils’ perceived resentment of being divided in a smaller group. In addition, pupils described effective co-teaching requiring teachers to be cooperative, have common ground rules and be equal. The results suggest that pupils perceive co-teaching as a way of working that supports their learning, but that it requires certain conditions to work. Although the results cannot be considered universal, they do suggest that co-teaching is a way of working that, if it works, can significantly facilitate pupils' learning and access to support.