Skip to main content
Login | Suomeksi | På svenska | In English

Browsing by Subject "monialaiset oppimiskokonaisuudet"

Sort by: Order: Results:

  • Rossinen, Eveliina (2018)
    The complexity of our world today, the increasing information and rapid changes are affecting also our school systems and learning. The new national core curriculum in basic education introduced multidisciplinary modules, which are offering a solution for teaching 21st century skills to children. The multidisciplinary modules combine different subjects in a goal-directed and well-planned way. The multidisciplinary modules are one of the very similar concepts such as integrated learning and phenomenon-based learning. As previous releases have shown, there are many ways of executing multidisciplinary modules. The mission of this study is to clarify the views of primary school teachers in Helsinki on using multidisciplinary modules and how they have put those modules into practice. In addition, the mission is to clarify primary school teachers’ thoughts on the benefits and possible challenges and difficulties on using multidisciplinary modules. The study was conducted using qualitative approach interviewing six primary school teachers from four different schools in Helsinki. The interviews were held in February 2018 and all the interviews were semi-structured. The data was analysed following the principles of qualitative content analysis. In the content analysis, the material was categorized from small categories to larger ones using the help of the themes and questions used in the interview. The study showed that teachers execute multidisciplinary modules in many different ways, but still following the terms of the national core curriculum and Helsinki’s local core curriculum. The length of teachers’ views on multidisciplinary modules did vary, but the content of their answers was quite similar. As challenges and difficulties the teachers mentioned working environment, difficult students, students with special needs or Finnish as second language -students and surprising situations. According to the teachers’ answers, the benefits of using multidisciplinary modules are developing pupils’ social, thinking and 21st century skills, seeing the causation, bringing learning closer to pupils’ own experience and knowledge and creating a positive atmosphere in the classroom.
  • Okkonen, Aliisa (2021)
    The increase in knowledge and continuous changes in our world affect upbringing and education. In autumn 2016 came into effect the new curriculum of comprehensive school that obligated schools to promote integrated learning and multidisciplinarity by arranging multidisciplinary learning modules. The objective of this study is to find out class teachers’ experiences and views of multidisciplinary learning modules as a part of everyday school. The purpose of this study is to understand what kind of advantages and challenges class teachers see in multidisciplinary learning modules, how class teachers feel about their own competences to implement those modules, and what is the value of cooperation in class teachers’ opinion when implementing multidisciplinary learning modules. Forty class teachers responded to this study through an online survey. The online survey was shared to two social media groups. The groups consisted mostly of professionals of education and class teacher students. The study was based on tradition of phenomenology due to the study’s interest in class teachers’ experiences. According to phenomenology, experiences are human’s experiential relations to his/her own reality. Participants of this study experienced multidisciplinary learning modules mostly as a positive part of everyday school. The biggest advantages of the multidisciplinary learning modules were increased cooperation, communality, and pupils’ motivation for school. Class teachers considered communal planning of multidisciplinary learning modules laborious, however, they though that cooperation was an important part of successful multidisciplinary learning modules. This study was also interested in class teachers’ opinions about their own competences to implement multidisciplinary learning modules. Class teachers of this study experienced that they have enough competence to implement multidisciplinary learning modules.
  • Tiilikainen, Vera (2022)
    Majority of experts working in the educational sector share the view that in the future, there is an increasing need to integrate knowledge from different disciplines. At the same time, importance of knowledge processing skills is highlighted. In the Finnish National Core Curriculum for Basic Education the answer to these future demands is multidisciplinary learning modules. The purpose of this study is to examine how multidisciplinary learning modules are carried out in different schools. With this study I also want to find out which parties have the greatest impact on planning the multidisciplinary learning modules, what kind of goals, contents and practices are being chosen for the module and how students are involved in the process. This study was qualitative research. The data was collected by thematic interviews. The interviews were attended by three primary school teachers and three primary school student teachers. Collected data was analyzed by using data driven content analysis. The results show that the guidelines for multidisciplinary learning modules came often for the teachers from the local curriculum and for the student teachers from the training teacher. The contents of environmental studies were emphasized significantly in multidisciplinary learning modules. The interviewees used mainly phenomenon-based integration in their teaching but the main goal for the learning modules was to improve student’s collaboration skills rather than to integrate different subjects. The students didn’t really have a chance to participate in the planning of multidisciplinary learning modules and their role in the decision making regarding the execution was minor. However the students had a significant role in the assessment of the multidisciplinary learning module. On the other hand the interviewees did not necessarily give any feedback to students at the end of the multidisciplinary learning module. In the future it would be interesting to interview students regarding their experiences of multidisciplinary learning modules.