Skip to main content
Login | Suomeksi | På svenska | In English

Browsing by Subject "palestiinalaiset"

Sort by: Order: Results:

  • Prittinen, Satu (2015)
    Aims of the Study. This Study's Aim was to find out the factors that influence Well-Being in the storycrafted stories of Finnish and Palestinian Children. In the past ten years the research of Children's Well-Being has partly developed to a more childperspective direction. Children have slowly started moving from being objects to active subjects and becoming experts of their own Well-Being. This sort of expertese and respect of Childrens own visions has been the Aim also in this Study. In the present Study the focus is on both the resources and suppressors of the Well-Being as well as the similarities and differences between the stories of the Children from two Nationalities. Awareness of the factors influencing Children's Well-Being can on it's part help the Adults working with Children to pay more attention to the things that are meaningful for Children. Methods. The Research Data was given as a ready collected data from the research project Children tell about their Well-Being – Who listens? (projectnumber 1134911), that was funded by Academy of Finland. The research consortium was a collaboration between the Universities of Helsinki and Oulu. In the University of Helsinki it was led by professor Liisa Karlsson. The Finnish stories were retrieved from the Finnish Social Sciences data archive. These stories were collected between the years 1996-2001. The Palestinian data was gathered in Lebanon among the Palestinian refugees between the years 2006-2012. Altogether the datas consist of 81 stories, of which 42 are from Finns and 39 are from Palestinians.Children in both datas were 2-12 years old. In the review of the stories the wellfare theory by Erik Allardt(1976), a Finnish sociologist, was used as a guideline. The resources and suppressors of Well-Being were monitored through Allardt's dimensions of wellfare; material conditions (having), social relationships (loving) and the societal level (being). In the analysingprocess quatifying and contets specification were used. Results and conclusions. The resources of Well-Being in the stories from both datas were home, the satisfaction of basic needs, happiness, play, peer relationships, family and the possibility to influence in their own matters. In addition to these, in the stories of the Palestinians feeling secure and the possibility to influence thorough dance were also regarded as resources. In Finnish stories also autonomous adventures with peers were labelled as resources. Suppressors for Well-Being in the stories of both datas were shortcomings of material conditions, fear and shortcomings of the possibilities to influence own matters. Suppressors in the stories of Palestinians were also the lack of peer relationships, impossibility to play or to attend school, loss of close-ones and the unsaturation of basic needs. Additional suppressors in the stories of the Finns were difficulties in play and being left alone. In the stories of Palestinian Children one can find the experiences and consequences of War from the Child's point of view. In the stories of Finnish Children material conditions and possibilities of influencing own matters were better than in the Palestinian stories. Finnish stories revealed also challenges in peer relationships. As a conclusion from the stories of the Children peer relationships, play, family, satisfaction of basic needs and the possibility to influence ones own matters appear to be meaningful for the Well-Being of Children from both countries.
  • Guillaume, Marja (2015)
    In this research we examined, first, the relation between war traumas and other significant stress-factors and school achievement. Second, we tested if Urie Bronfenbrenners PPCT-model could structure the factors affecting school achievement. Finally we searched to find out if any of those factors could protect school achievement from the effects of major negative life-events. The study was conducted in two stages, in spring 2006 and 2007 and included 303 children, aged 10-13 years from the 6th grade. 48,8% were boys and 51,2% girls. The research consisted of self-report questionnaires. Language skills were tested with the Arabic Achievement Test, mathematic skills with the Mathematics Achievement Test, major negative life-eventswith the Major Life-event Checklist, traumatic experiences with Inclusive Gaza Traumatic Event Checklist, coping-skills with the shortened version of Children's Coping Stategies Checklist- Revised 1-lomaketta, jolla arvioitiin lapsen coping-keinoja, Motivational Strategies for Learning Questionnaire, parental scholastic-support practices were measured with a newly-developed instrument, siblings relations was measured with the Siblings Relation scale, teachers practices were measured with an instrument based on the Students Perception about School Work instrument, and peer social relationship with the Friendship Quality and Peer Popularity/Acceptance scale. The results show that the negative life-events have a negative effect on school-achievement. Despite this the traumatic events didn't affect negatively students school-achievement. The results showed also that Urie Brofenbrenners PPCT-model could help structure the factors affecting school-achievement. The role of parents and teachers didn't rise as significant. Instead the results showed that good motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning could protect school-achievement from the impact of negative life-events. The results on whereby the good motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning would protect school-achievement from negative life-events is only partially confirmed by previous research. Instead the results showing that parents and teacher didn't play any part in school-achievement is surprising compared to the previous research and awakens a need for further research. If in future researches it is possible to confirm the special role of good motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning for the shool-achievement of children in difficult conditions it would point-out a new priority in teaching and raising children for schools, teachers and parents.