Skip to main content
Login | Suomeksi | På svenska | In English

Browsing by Subject "university"

Sort by: Order: Results:

  • Jaskari, Johanna (2015)
    Aims. The purpose of this qualitative study was to systematically analyze how university teaching and learning vary in one Finnish university. My research questions were "How do students' approaches to learning vary?" and "How do teachers' approaches to teaching vary?" In this systematic review, I used the relational model of learning and teaching in universities as a theoretical framework. This model provides a tool to analyze the variation in students' approaches to learning and teachers' approaches to teaching in different teaching-learning environments. The quality of what students learn is linked to the variation in how students learn and how university teachers teach in teaching-learning environments in universities. The quality of learning and teaching is also connected with the allocation of resources and funding in universities and global university rankings. Methods. By using the method of systematic review, I analyzed the variation in teaching and learning in a data sample of 23 high-quality peer-reviewed academic articles. The research context of the studies, which concerned teaching and learning in universities, was the University of Helsinki. Results and conclusions. In this review, students' learning varies mainly in how the students approach their learning (i.e. as surface or deep approaches to learning). Students' learning is modified by the students' learning strategies (e.g. as systematic or critical studies), study orientations (i.e. reproduction- or meaning-oriented learning), and study orchestrations (i.e. different profiles of approaches to learning). Teaching varies mainly in how the teachers approach their teaching (i.e. as teacher- or student-focused approaches to teaching). Teaching is modified by the teachers' conceptions of teaching, teaching strategies (i.e. content- or learning-focused approaches to teaching), and amounts of pedagogical training (that affect the approaches to teaching). Both learning and teaching vary in different teaching-learning environments (both within courses and between disciplines). Both students' and teachers' conceptions of knowledge (e.g. as integrated or fragmented knowledge; declarative or procedural knowledge) affect their approaches to learning and teaching. This systematic review synthesizes what we know about learning and teaching in one university in Finland. This knowledge provides guidelines on how the quality of learning and teaching can be improved both in policy and practice largely in universities in Finland. Essentially, learning is based on good teaching that is focused on the students' learning.
  • Holopainen, Emilia (2014)
    The aim of the study was to analyze international students' typical paths to acculturate into the student community by using the research question: What kind of paths international students use to acculturate into the student community in Oklahoma State University and in the University of Helsinki? The study is current, because of the continuing increase of students' mobility and importance of students' acculturation into a new culture and student community in order to feel comfortable in a new university. Earlier studies have proven that students' sociocultural adjustment will foster psychological adjustment in a new environment. The research data was collected by interviewing international students from the University of Helsinki and Oklahoma State University. The interviewees were 13 students from Europe, Asia, Africa and South- America. The data has been analyzed by using qualitative content analysis. Based on the analysis, the results have been divided into nine categories: prior arrival, orientation, housing, social gatherings, behavior patterns, class, language, social support and failed tries to adapt. Students focused on using assimilation and integration as acculturation strategies, based on Berry's four-fold model of acculturation. Students, who were planning to stay in the host country after graduation, tried to acculturate by learning for example Finnish language skills. They were also motivated to meet both international and local people. With time, students have started to create more friendships with local students alongside with other international students. Successful paths to acculturate had little different emphasis between these two universities. Biggest difference is on the path of social gatherings; students from Oklahoma State University met many new students through sports, and students from the University of Helsinki felt that parties were one of easiest places to meet new people.