Skip to main content
Login | Suomeksi | På svenska | In English

Browsing by Author "Lundin, Johan"

Sort by: Order: Results:

  • Holmström, Oscar; Linder, Nina; Lundin, Mikael; Moilanen, Hannu; Suutala, Antti; Turkki, Riku; Joensuu, Heikki; Isola, Jorma; Diwan, Vinod; Lundin, Johan (2015)
    Introduction: A significant barrier to medical diagnostics in low-resource environments is the lack of medical care and equipment. Here we present a low-cost, cloud-connected digital microscope for applications at the point-of-care. We evaluate the performance of the device in the digital assessment of estrogen receptor-alpha (ER) expression in breast cancer samples. Studies suggest computer-assisted analysis of tumor samples digitized with whole slide-scanners may be comparable to manual scoring, here we study whether similar results can be obtained with the device presented. Materials and methods: A total of 170 samples of human breast carcinoma, immunostained for ER expression, were digitized with a high-end slide-scanner and the point-of-care microscope. Corresponding regions from the samples were extracted, and ER status was determined visually and digitally. Samples were classified as ER negative (<1% ER positivity) or positive, and further into weakly (1-10% positivity) and strongly positive. Interobserver agreement (Cohen's kappa) was measured and correlation coefficients (Pearson's product-momentum) were calculated for comparison of the methods. Results: Correlation and interobserver agreement (r = 0.98, p < 0.001, kappa = 0.84, CI95% = 0.75-0.94) were strong in the results from both devices. Concordance of the point-of-care microscope and the manual scoring was good (r = 0.94, p < 0.001, kappa = 0.71, CI95% = 0.61-0.80), and comparable to the concordance between the slide scanner and manual scoring (r = 0.93, p < 0.001, kappa = 0.69, CI95% = 0.60-0.78). Fourteen (8%) discrepant cases between manual and device-based scoring were present with the slide scanner, and 16 (9%) with the point-of-care microscope, all representing samples of low ER expression. Conclusions: Tumor ER status can be accurately quantified with a low-cost imaging device and digital image-analysis, with results comparable to conventional computer-assisted or manual scoring. This technology could potentially be expanded for other histopathological applications at the point-of-care.
  • Stenman, Sebastian; Siironen, Päivi; Mustonen, Harri; Lundin, Johan; Haglund, Caj; Arola, Johanna (2018)
    Background The subtype of the papillary thyroid carcinoma tall cell variant (TCV) has a worse prognosis than does the conventional papillary type (PTC). The new WHO 2017 classification defines a TCV as a tumor consisting of over 30% of cells that are two or three times as tall as they are wide. However, thresholds have differed. Our aim was to study how tall cells affect the prognosis of PTC patients and to determine, for such cells, a cut-off percentage. Methods Our cohort included 65 PTC patients who underwent surgery at Helsinki University Hospital between 1973 and 1996: originally 36 otherwise-matched patient pairs, eventually comprising 34 patients with an adverse outcome and 31 who had recovered. All samples were digitally scanned and scored by two investigators based on tall cell composition. The cohort was analyzed with four tall cell (TC) thresholds: 10%, 30%, 50%, and 70% with a median follow-up of 22 years. Results In survival analysis, only the 70% threshold showed a correlation with reduced overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and relapse-free survival (RFS). A correlation also emerged with death from PTC. In a multivariate analysis, a 70% cut-off and age at diagnosis significantly affected DSS. Conclusion A TC composition of 10%, 30%, or 50% showed no correlation with adverse outcome, and suggests that a 70% threshold should be the choice of pathologists reporting TCV. Our results thus fail to support the new WHO classification.