Browsing by Subject "Uterine leiomyoma"

Uterine leiomyomas are common smooth muscle tumours, with a prevalence as high as 80%. Even though they are benign, they present severe symptoms such as heavy menstrual bleeding, pelvic pain and reproductive dysfunction. Uterine leiomyomas can be classified to conventional tumours and leiomyoma variants based on their histopathology. The tumours usually harbour one of the three driver alterations: MED12 mutations, HMGA2 overexpression or biallelic FH inactivation. Known risk factors for leiomyoma development are African ancestry, family history and age. Uterine leiomyomas are most typically treated by surgery, through either uterus preserving myomectomy or by definitive hysterectomy. This Master’s thesis is continuation of a study from Äyräväinen et al. 2020, a retrospective study of 234 patients undergoing myomectomy at Helsinki University Hospital during 2009-2014. The aim of this study was to analyse how many of these patients had developed recurrent leiomyomas and how often the tumours in subsequent operations were potentially clonally related. In addition, clinical characteristics associated with the operations were analysed. In total 18% of these patients had recurrent operations, leading to the screening of 77 individual uterine leiomyomas from 32 patients. The mutational statuses were studied systematically with molecular screening using Sanger sequencing and immunohistochemistry. Altogether 33 tumours from 21 patients were found to have identical mutational status with a tumour from the original study. Of these tumours, 14 had a MED12 mutation. All the MED12 mutations were found in exon two affecting either codons 44 or 36. Six tumours had HMGA2 overexpression, and eight tumours were FH deficient. Five tumours were triple negative for all studied alterations. Whereas 81% of the patients had had two removal operations, the rest of them had had three to five operations. The years between operations ranged from performing them on the same year to performing them ten years apart. Even though most of the recurrent tumours were sporadic, almost half (43%) of them had identical mutations, suggesting that though uterine leiomyomas usually arise independently, some might be clonally related. The mutational distribution was different in the recurrent tumours than in uterine leiomyomas in general, indicating that in addition to germline predisposition, the driver related characteristics might also contribute to the potential of recurrence and to the likelihood of developing clonal lesions. Tumours harbouring MED12 abnormalities were the least probable to be clonally related. The tumours showing identical HMGA2 overexpression were likely clonally related. The number of identical FH deficient ULs was high, but not unexpected, since all the patients harbouring the mutation in the recurrent tumours had HLRCC, and therefore having a predisposition. Most surprisingly, all patients with recurrent triple negative tumours had identical mutation statuses in the recurrent tumours, which points to previously unknown clonal development of these lesions. Most of the patients with more than two surgeries had recurrent mutations, suggesting that multiple surgeries might indicate the development of clonally related tumours. However, further research is required to confirm the clonal relationships and to investigate the pathological nature of the tumours with different driver alterations.