Skip to main content
Login | Suomeksi | På svenska | In English

Browsing by Subject "hyvinvoinnin määrittäminen tilatasolla"

Sort by: Order: Results:

  • Jääskeläinen, Terhi (2010)
    The aim of this study was to investigate connections between on-farm assessed welfare scores and production parameters of sows. Welfare was assessed using a Finnish on-farm assessment system, the A-index. Two different kinds of production data were used, both originating from the national herd surveillance database. Welfare assessments were done on 30 commercial piglet, gilt producing and integrated farms during March 2007. One trained person did the scoring on all the farms visited. The A-index comprises of six categories: ‘locomotion’, ‘social interaction’, ‘floor quality’, ‘stable climate’, ‘feeding’ and ‘health and stockmanship’. Each category has 3-10 mostly environmental-based parameters that differ between different unit types. The maximum total score for a unit is 100. Scoring was performed separately in the farrowing, breeding and gestation sow units. The small number of independent breeding units (n=7) led to a combination of the breeding and gestation unit scores for dry sow unit; the averages are used for statistical analysis. Two production data used were 1) Farm record data (n=29), which is a basic data including farm and production parameters from the year preceding the on-farm assessment visit, 2) POTSI-data (n=30), where the production data are modified with the POTSI-application (MTT) so that the impact of management group (farm, year and season) can be seen. Connections were studied with correlation and regression analyses. Although participation was voluntary in terms of production data systems the experiment farms represented the average Finnish farm. Total A-index points varied between 37,5-64,0 for lactating and between 39,5-83,5 for dry sows. Concerning the Farm record data the better A-index scores from ‘health and stockmanship’ category during lactation period shortened the reproduction cycle, decreased the percentage of stillborn piglets and increased the number of litters and piglets per sow per year. Regression models gave significant explanation value to ‘health and stockmanship’, when variation in the number of piglets per year, the length of farrowing interval and the number of farrowings before culling was explained. Better locomotion opportunities in dry sow unit had negative impact on the number of piglets born and weaned per year. Regression model gave significant explanation value to ‘locomotion’ and to percentage of first litters when variation in the number of weaned piglets was explained. With POTSI-data lower number of stillborn piglets was related with better ‘social interaction’ scores with gilts in farrowing unit and better ‘health and stockmanship’ scores with sows in dry sow unit. The results from two production data differ from each other and it would be advisable to use Farm record data, with the production records from the whole year, for future studies on the subject. Based on this experiment actions to improve animal welfare also have an economical impact as they enhance the production of the sows. Especially good quality stockmanship and healthier animals results in greater number of piglets born and shorter reproduction cycle. Special attention should be paid to minimizing the social stress and the success of feeding in group housed gestating sows.
  • Pirttinen, Heli (2013)
    The aim of this study was to assess animal welfare on-farm and investigate the associations of assessed welfare and environment to the behavior of growing and finishing pigs. Welfare Quality® protocol for growing and finishing pigs was used for evaluation of welfare, environment and behaviour. Welfare assessments were done on 53 finishing pig farms and 30 finisher units on integrated farms between December 2010 and June 2011. Welfare Quality® index is divided in four principles: “good feeding”, “good housing”, “good health” and “appropriate behavior”. Principles are divided in 12 criteria, that are further more divided in 30 measurable parameters. Index includes both animal and environment-based measures. All criteria were scored on the scale 0-100. Criteria scores are the base for principle scores. Principles were scored from 0 to 100 weighed by the weakest criteria. Connections between exploratory criteria score and principle score of behavior to environment were studied with correlation and regression analyses. On average finishing pig farms were larger than the finisher units on integrated farms. Both production manners represent comprehensive Finnish pig production. There were no interactions between social behavior and environment. There was significant differ between production manners on the criteria score of social behavior (p=0,036). Criteria score on finisher units of integrated farms were lower (median 83,3) than on finisher pig farms (median 92,1). There was positive correlation between positive and negative social behavior (0,222; p=0,044). There was significant differ between QBA criteria score and the amount of enrichment material (p=0,001). Farms, that gave only enrichment material had lower QBA score (median 73,90) than farms, that used also litter material (median 86,95). Social behaviour, QBA and principle score of housing explain 32,7 % of the dispersion of explora-tory behavior. There was connection between principle score of behavior and environment. Area, weight of the pigs, severe lameness and severe dirtiness explained 36,5 % of the dispersion of principle scores of behavior. Even though weight, lameness and dirtiness are not directly environment parametres, they were taken to the model because they correlated strongly with the principle scores of behavior. Weight of the pigs was assumed to affect to behavior, and lameness and dirtiness are animal-based measures that reflect the environment. There were connections between on-farm assessed welfare and environment to pig behaviour. Animal-based measures give more substantive picture how the animal is coping in its environment than environment-based measures. Reliable on-farm welfare assessment tool is the only way to maintain and improve animal welfare on a manner, that satisfies producers, consumers and researchers.