Skip to main content
Login | Suomeksi | På svenska | In English

Browsing by Title

Sort by: Order: Results:

  • Dande, Tichaona (2020)
    Militarised politics remains a single danger to democracy. Coups and military interventions accounts for 75% of global democratic failures and mark transitions to military rule. Against this background, this study investigates the unconstitutional November 2017 military-assisted political transition in Zimbabwe that resulted in the ouster of Mugabe from power to understand the ramifications of the succession process, outcomes and impacts on democratic governance. The study examines the inherent political conflicts between the military and civilian leaders where the military seek to secure dominant control in the political society despite constitutional obligations that the military remains apolitical. The principal objective of the thesis is to interrogate the growing decisive role and influence of the military in Zimbabwe’s contemporary politics. The study starts by critiquing the colonial historical aspects to understand the institutions that created the military dimensions. Mugabe shaped the governance political and electoral systems based on militarised colonial structures that further advanced his political monopoly instead of building effective political institutions based on the rule of law. Three broad research questions examined whether the military is undermining a democracy based political system in favour of authoritarianism, explores the domestic, regional and international factors that motivated the transition and the impacts and implications on democratic governance. The political transition and objective civilian control theories are deployed to expand the understanding of the complex military role in politics. In analysing the strategic interaction of authoritarian regimes and their opponents, the thesis noted that the military acted as a bureaucratic socio-political system rather than a professional institution in national politics. The findings concluded that military practices and actions in the distribution of power, intervention or meddling in internal domestic politics, governance and representation under authoritarian regimes has cross-cutting effects on the broader concept of democratic governance. There is substantial evidence that highlights that the military and political elites have remained leading actors in political life that sustains and maintains authoritarian structures. The thesis also observed that as an instrument of power transfer, the military establishment’s active participation strengthens the military as an autonomous political actor against Huntington’s objective civilian control, strengthening ZANU PF power retention to protect the institution’s strategic interests at the expense of national interests and human security, value systems, national progress and sustainable development. The empirical analysis reflects that militarized politics is a threat on democratic governance principles hence the need for ambitious institutional, political, legal and security sector reforms based on a model that strengthens human rights and guarantees the protection of civilian society from external threats and from the military institution itself.
  • Hiltunen, Juri (2020)
    By utilizing the psychoanalytic theory of Jacques Lacan, Slavoj Žižek adds an analysis of unconscious desire to the theory of ideology. By analyzing the terrain of unconsciously structured desires, Žižek attempts to bring the concept of ideology back into contemporary debates and argue that people in fact more ideological than it seems. This thesis analyzes Žižek’s theory of ideology and contains a critical account on it. The aims of this thesis are threefold. Firstly, this thesis contains an analytical framework for analyzing Žižek’s theory of ideology. Secondly, this thesis introduces Žižek’s theory of ideology in a clear manner by employing multiple everyday examples and by minimizing the number of technical concepts. Thirdly, this thesis provides a critical evaluation on his account of ideology criticism in his theory of ideology. In the first main chapter, the framework for analyzing theories of ideology is introduced. The chapter argues that ideologies in general can be analyzed by asking five different questions, which are 1. what is ideology, 2. is ideology good or bad, 3. who is ideological, 4. how and why do ideologies cause things, and 5. what is ideology’s context. This framework is combined from various introductory works on ideology and provides a roadmap where different theories of ideology can be placed on, Žižek’s theory included. This is done in order to analyze Žižek’s theory of ideology in more lucid manner than usually conducted in the commentary literature. In the second main chapter, Žižek’s theory of ideology is introduced. According to Žižek, ideology is an illusion of the completeness of the big Other that takes place in subject’s unconsciously structured fantasies. The main bulk of the chapter unpacks this technical-sounding definition. At the end of the second main chapter, the analysis returns to the framework of ideology analysis laid down in the first chapter and places Žižek’s theory of ideology within this framework in order to summarize his theory of ideology in a condensed, clear, and analytical fashion. The third critical chapter provides an evaluation on the question if Žižek’s theory constitutes a credible critical theory of ideology. The novelty of the chapter is the systematization of criticisms against his immanent account of ideology critique. On the one hand, his theory of ideology strives to set up a possibility of immanent critique of ideology; on the other hand, his theory does not fulfill the criteria required for it. This chapter elaborates on three criteria of immanent critique and argues that Žižek fails all three criteria because of three reasons. Firstly, his theory lacks a robust epistemological justification. Secondly, his theory strikes as a self-undermining theory. Thirdly, he does not provide any normative criterion why some ideologies would be better than others. Lastly, the thesis suggests a possible Žižekian answer to the criticisms and points out a direction for future research.