Browsing by Subject "Wampler"

Participatory budgeting (PB) is a political process where individual citizens are given the opportunity to express their preferences and interests in public forums, along with the right to vote on specific policies, thereby affecting how the budget is allocated. Participatory budgeting is often seen as a potential solution to the challenges faced by representative democracies. It provides an opportunity for new voices to enter the political arena and promotes social justice by enabling citizens to express their preferences and interests. It also enhances bureaucracies by opening new channels of communication between city experts and citizens and by creating new tools and processes for enacting policies. Since its first appearance in Brazil in 1989, participatory budgeting processes have proliferated, with approximately 8,000 rounds conducted worldwide. In this thesis, I analyzed Helsinki's OmaStadi participatory budgeting process, which took place from 2018 to 2020. It was the first of its scale in Finland, with EUR 4.4 million allocated to various projects proposed by Helsinki residents. Over 1,200 proposals were submitted, and nearly 50,000 people voted for 44 projects to be realized. In the thesis, I first examine the background and theory of participatory budgeting and then discuss the methodological tools used in my analysis. I then move on to the analysis itself, where I compare material coded from the final evaluation and examine it through the lens of the four principles for enacting social change in participatory budgeting programs introduced by Brian Wampler: voice, vote, social justice, and oversight. My goal was to determine to what extent the pilot project succeeded in enacting social and political renewal through this framework. I approached this task by conducting a case study and using content analysis as my tool for analyzing the final evaluation of OmaStadi conducted by BIBU, the research project funded by the Strategic Research Council of the Academy of Finland. In my analysis, I also offer various suggestions and pointers for the development of the next rounds of OmaStadi. My findings suggest that, in addition to its many successes, as a pilot project, there is still a lot of potential for further developing OmaStadi to better achieve the ideals set by the four principles for successful PB programs.