Browsing by Subject "kahdentuminen"

Objectives. This Bachelor’s thesis tries to understand the aesthetic doubling theory and different aspects that are involved with the theory of doubling. The purpose of this study is to categorize aesthetic doubling in to different categories and use that categorization as a tool to analyse three Finnish dissertations. This study aims to create a deeper understanding of this multidimensional theory. Main questions for this study was how three Finnish researchers define aesthetic doubling as well as what kind of different views can be found in these three dissertations? Methods. Study is part of behavioural sciences and qualitative studies. Qualitative meta-analysis and content-analysis was used as methodological background for theme categorization. The categorization was created as a combination of theoretical views on basic drama action and definition of aesthetic doubling. The dissertations that were examined are Tapio Toivanen (2002) Mä en ois ikinä uskonu ittestäni sellasta, Hannu Heikkinen (2002) Draaman maailmat oppimisalueina ja Erkki Laakso (2004) Draamakokemusten äärellä. Two different aspects, fiction and reality, explain aesthetic doubling as a phenomenon. In categorization that was made for this study, fiction and reality are the two upper categories. Under those two are lower categories in-role-action, dimension of time and place as well as drama contract, planning and reflection. Results and conclutions. It seems that Anna-Lena Østern has affected both Laakso’s and Heikkinen’s views of aesthetic doubling and contributed their dissertations in Jyväskylä university. Toivanen’s dissertation was made in Helsinki and focuses more on different dimensions of aesthetic doubling, such as in-role-action/doubling in role. Heikkinen and Laakso present more of the different dimensions of aesthetic doubling and especially Heikkinen has very wide viewpoints of aesthetic doubling’s dimensions in reality.