Skip to main content
Login | Suomeksi | På svenska | In English

Browsing by Subject "next-generation sequencing"

Sort by: Order: Results:

  • Almusa, Henrikki (2013)
    The next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms create a large amount of sequence in short amount of time, when compared to first generation sequencers. An overview of the NGS platforms is provided with more in-depth look into Illumina Genome Analyzer II as that is used to create the data for the thesis. There were two main aims in this thesis. First, to create a pipeline which can be used to analyse genomic sequencing. Second, to use the pipeline to compare whole human exome capture methods from two manufacturers, Roche Nimblegen and Agilent. The pipeline is describe in detail in material and methods. All the inputs for the pipeline are described and examples shown. In the pipeline the given sequences are first aligned against the reference genome. Then various separate analysis is performed to retrieve variants and coverage of the sequencing. Supplementary results include paired-end anomalies, larger insertion and deletion polymorphisms and assembly of non-aligned sequences. The two capture methods are also described and changes to the manufacturers' recommended protocols are listed. Finally, the section has the options and various inputs used in the pipeline runs of the exome data. The results of the pipeline is a basic level of analysis of the sequencing as well as various graphs showing the quality of the run. All the output files intended for user are described. By using the results of the pipeline, the user can do more in-depth analysis as required by the project. When comparing the two exome capture methods, the Nimblegen capture was shown to be more efficient in capturing the CCDS exome. While the Agilent capture kit provided better one fold coverage over the exome, higher fold coverage (over 10 fold), which is required for reliable variant calling in nextgeneration sequencing, was better reached using the Nimblegen capture kit. Also, significantly fewer false positive paired-end anomalies were observed in the library created by using the Nimblegen capture.
  • Sulo, Päivi (2019)
    Retrotransposons are genetic elements with the ability to make a copy of themselves and insert the copy into a new location in a genome. Most of the retrotransposons in the human genome are not transposition competent and the remaining copies are prevented from moving by epigenetics. However, some tumors experience abnormal retrotransposon activity resulting in many copies of retrotransposons inserted into new locations. Retrotransposons can be detected from sequenced genome data by bioinformatic tools. One of them is TraFiC, a tool designed to detect somatic retrotransposon insertions from tumor samples. In this Master’s thesis, I test TraFiC with 201 colorectal cancer tumors and one colorectal adenoma and develop tools to further analyze retrotransposon insertions. These tools are TraID, a pipeline to detect transductions, insertions with flanking sequence from source elements, and InSeqR, a pipeline to recreate the inserted sequence from known insertion sites. TraFiC detected 4744 somatic insertions and TraID detected 346 somatic transductions from the tumor samples. 80 % of the detected insertions were identified as true somatic insertions based on visual examination of a subset of the calls. 87 % of insertions detected by TraFiC and 82 % of the insertions detected by TraID had their insertion breakpoints and the sequence flanking them recreated by InSeqR. The detected insertions with their sequence form a reliable and comprehensive call set that can be used to create new knowledge of somatic retrotransposon insertions in colorectal cancer.
  • Järvinen, Maija (2010)
    The growing interest for sequencing with higher throughput in the last decade has led to the development of new sequencing applications. This thesis concentrates on optimizing DNA library preparation for Illumina Genome Analyzer II sequencer. The library preparation steps that were optimized include fragmentation, PCR purification and quantification. DNA fragmentation was performed with focused sonication in different concentrations and durations. Two column based PCR purification method, gel matrix method and magnetic bead based method were compared. Quantitative PCR and gel electrophoresis in a chip were compared for DNA quantification. The magnetic bead purification was found to be the most efficient and flexible purification method. The fragmentation protocol was changed to produce longer fragments to be compatible with longer sequencing reads. Quantitative PCR correlates better with the cluster number and should thus be considered to be the default quantification method for sequencing. As a result of this study more data have been acquired from sequencing with lower costs and troubleshooting has become easier as qualification steps have been added to the protocol. New sequencing instruments and applications will create a demand for further optimizations in future.