Browsing by Subject "ideal inhalator"

This study aims to address how easily an individual with no prior inhaler experience can learn to use a dry powder inhaler (DPI) through video education. This is a comparative study of four DPIs (Diskus, Easyhaler, Ellipta and Turbuhaler). Different properties affecting ease of use, patient preference as well as educational videos as a method of providing inhaler instructions were investigated. The study used a triangular methodology. The sample consisted of 31 individuals (24-35 years). All participants were considered inhaler naïve. After watching the video education material for a particular inhaler the participants' demonstrated the use of it. Educational videos for all four inhalers were watched and use of all placebo inhalers was demonstrated in a random order. These demonstrations were videotaped. The demonstrations were thereafter checked against a predefined checklist and all mistakes were recorded. Only 33 % of inhaler demonstrations were completed without the participants making any mistakes that could compromise the efficacy of the inhaled medication in a real-life situation. The frequency of error varied greatly between different types of inhalers. Ellipta proved to be most often used correctly with 55 % demonstrating use without making any mistakes. This was closely followed by Diskus for which 48 % demonstrated correct use. The difference between the average error frequency for Ellipta and Diskus was statistically insignificant. With Easyhaler 19 % percent of participants were able to demonstrate correct use, the corresponding percentage for Turbuhaler was 16 %. When comparing participants' demonstrations for Easyhaler and Turbuhaler, the difference in average error frequency between the devices were not statistically significant. The average frequency of error was lower when using Ellipta in comparison to Easyhaler and Turbuhaler (statistically significant). The same indications were found when comparing average frequency of error for Diskus, to those for Easyhaler and Turbuhaler. Comparing the participants self-reported correct use against the actual numbers it is clear that participants often thought they were using the inhaler correctly when they in fact were not. When asked to rank the inhalers from most preferred to least preferred, Ellipta emerged as a favorite. Turbuhaler received the second highest scores, Diskus the third and Easyhaler was least preferred. However, only the difference between preference scores for Ellipta and Easyhaler was deemed statistically significant. The high frequency of error suggests that even though participants generally considered the inhalers intuitive and easy to use, they would have required more comprehensive inhaler education in order to achieve correct inhaler technique. Further, the results indicate that video demonstrations are not ideal for providing inhaler education for first time inhalers users. The most prominent problem with video education is that it provides no feedback to the user regarding their inhaler technique. This may present real problems as the results of this study show that participants tended to overestimate their own inhaler technique. Patient education plays a central role in asthma care and needs to be given proper attention even though the inhalers might be considered intuitive and easy to operate. Interesting areas for future research include investigating interactive learning videos as a way of improving video education on inhaler technique.