Browsing by Subject "kliininen farmasia"

During the past few decades the focus of the pharmacy profession has shifted from medicinal products towards ensuring the welfare of the patient. The concept of pharmaceutical care emphasizes that the role of the pharmacist is to ensure the quality and safety of pharmaceutical therapy in collaboration with the patient. The concept of clinical pharmacy, on the other hand, highlights that the pharmacist should take the responsibility of the efficiency, safety and cost efficiency of the patient's pharmaceutical treatment together with other health-care professionals. Patient centered pharmacy services have been increased in Finnish hospitals and health care-centers during the last 10 years, for example, in the form of pharmacy services provided on the wards. Previous studies have shown that Finnish hospital pharmacists want to develop and increase clinical pharmacy services in hospitals but feel they are not competent enough to manage them. To develop and increase the number of clinical pharmacy services it is important to ensure the pharmacy professionals have support to their continuing professional development. The General Level Framework (GLF) has been developed in the UK to support the professional development of pharmacy professionals and its value has been shown in various studies. The aim of this study was to give information of the state of Finnish hospital pharmacy and its development needs as perceived by Finnish hospital pharmacists, and to investigate how the GLF can be utilized in Finnish hospital pharmacy. The study was conducted using two different research methods: a semi-structured interview was designed to investigate hospital pharmacists' perceptions of hospital pharmacy, it's development needs and utilization of the GLF; in addition, hospital pharmacists selfassessed their clinical pharmacy related competencies using the GLF. All of the participants of the study were participants of a clinical pharmacy course by University of Helsinki. In total 11 hospital pharmacists took part in the interview. Also 41 pharmacists self-assessed their competencies in clinical pharmacy using the GLF: eight of them completed the self-assessment twice with a six month period between the assessments. The interviewed pharmacists felt that the pharmacy curriculum should focus more on the skills and competencies needed in hospital pharmacy. On the other hand, they felt that the tasks of hospital pharmacists did not necessarily allow them to use their actual knowledge of pharmacy. They perceived that the future of hospital pharmacy lies in services of clinical pharmacy, although they felt that they were not competent enough to manage them. The GLF self-assessment showed that the clinical competencies of the participants were average, and there was no change in the competence of the participants during the six month period. However, the interviewed pharmacists felt that the GLF can be used as a tool for support the hospital pharmacists' professional development and continuing professional development in clinical pharmacy. They also perceived that there is a need for further studies on the clinical pharmacy services and their benefits, and that the task distribution of health care professionals in hospitals must be re-considered. With these actions, the challenges hindering the development and increase of clinical pharmacy services in Finnish hospitals could be overcome. They described that the greatest challenges to overcome were prejudices against pharmacist working on the wards and a lack of resources. In order to develop and increase clinical pharmacy services in Finnish hospitals and other health-care organizations further reseacrh on the benefits of clinical pharmacy should be conducted. It must also be ensured that all health-care professionals and decision makers are aware of the studies already made about clinical pharmacy and its benefits. The skill-mix of health care professionals taking part in a patient's treatment must be reconsidered in order to ensure that the patient receives the best, most efficient and safest possible medicinal care. The GLF can be used as a tool to define the role of a clinical pharmacist in Finland. There is a need for more clinical pharmacy education so that Finnish pharmacists can feel competent enough to manage clinical pharmacy tasks. The GLF can be used as a tool to support the professional development and continuing professional development also in Finland.

According to international studies, medication records are often incomplete in hospitals' patient information system. Medication reconciliation is an effective method to prevent medication errors and improve medication safety. A medication review is a useful tool in the assessment of drug-related problems (DRPs). DRPs can cause severe patient harm and even cause death. Approximately one third of Finnish people are diagnosed with cancer during their lifetime. About 16 000 patients receive cancer treatments in the Helsinki University Central Hospital Cancer Centre (HUCHCC). There are no clinical pharmacy services in the division of the solid tumors of HUCHCC. Internationally clinical pharmacy services in oncology are patient oriented and often include medication reconciliations and reviews. The clinical pharmacy services have increased patient safety also in the oncological specialty. The aim of this study was to find out the accuracy of the medication charts and identify the DRPs among 70-80-year-old patients with 6 or more medicines in uro-oncological outpatient clinic of HUCHCC. Accuracy of the medication charts was assessed by pharmacist-led medication reconciliation with patient interview. Information concerning patient's medication was also searched from the national electronical prescription centre and from the records of previous hospital visits. DRPs, such as drug-drug interactions, adverse drug reactions and overlapping medications, were identified with the pharmacist-led medication review. Special attention was paid to renal insuffiency, high-alert medications and potentially inappropriate medication for patients over 75 years old. Pharmacist discussed the DRPs with the oncology specialist. The theoretical framework of this study was the theory of human error, where patient safety hazards can be prevented by using safety defences such as medication reconciliation and medication review. Altogether 30 patients with urological cancer were included in this study. On average, they were 74.3 years old and used 12.4 medications. On average, there were 6.8 discrepancies per patient in the hospital medication chart. Only one patient had the accurate medication chart. The discrepancies were most commonly related to paracetamol (n = 10), vitamin-D (n = 9) and the combination of calcium and vitamin-D (n = 8). The most common discrepancies of high-alert medications were related to enoxaparin (n=6) and oxycodone (n=6). Of the potentially inappropriate medications for over 75 years old, the most common discrepancies were related magnesium (n=8) and metoclopramide (n=5). In the medication review process, 4 acute and 44 non-acute DRPs were identified with 22 patients (2,2 per patient). 60 % of these were regarded clinically relevant and lead to actions by the oncology specialist. Reconsidering the need or efficacy of the medication was recommended 19 times and inappropriate dose or medication with renal insufficiency were identified six times in medication reviews. DRPs were usually related to non-oncological medications such as pantoprazol (n=8), the combination of calcium and vitamin-D (n=4) ja bisoprolol (n=3). The medication reconciliation process should be developed in the urology-oncology outpatient clinic. Multiprofessional medication review can be used to detect and resolve DRPs of patients with urological cancer. The results of this study can be exploited when clinical pharmacy services will be created and developed in HUCHCC.

Osastofarmasian ja kliinisen farmasian palvelut Suomen sairaala-apteekeissa ja lääkekeskuksissa ovat jo 2000-luvun alusta lähtien kehittyneet suuntaan, johon Maailman terveysjärjestön (WHO) lääkitysturvallisuusohjelma Medication Without Harm ohjaa. Suomen viranomaiset ovat viime vuosina linjanneet farmasistien roolista moniammatillisessa lääkehoidon toteutuksessa useissa ohjeistuksissa. Vuosina 2017–2022 kotimaisessa ja kansainvälisessä tutkimuksessa osastofarmasian ja kliinisen farmasian hyötyjä sekä niiden yhteyttä lääkitysturvallisuuteen on tutkittu aktiivisesti. Osastofarmasian ja kliinisen farmasian palveluiden tilanteen ja niiden avulla saavutettujen hyötyjen ensimmäinen kansallinen kyselytutkimus sairaala-apteekeille ja lääkekeskuksille tehtiin Suomessa vuonna 2011, ja se toistettiin samalla menetelmällä vuonna 2016. Tämän tutkimuksen tavoitteena oli tehdä vastaava valtakunnallinen seuranta-tutkimus osastofarmasian ja kliinisen farmasian palvelujen tilanteesta Suomessa vuonna 2022. Tämä tutkimus toteutettiin samalla e-lomakepohjalla kuin aikaisemmat tutkimukset, muokaten kysymyksiä ajantasaisemmaksi. Kysely lähetettiin sairaala-apteekkeihin, julkisiin ja yksityisiin lääkekeskuksiin sekä joukolle vastaanottajia kuntayhtymissä, hyvinvointialueilla ja yrityksissä, joissa mahdollisesti tuotettiin osastofarmasian ja kliinisen farmasian palveluita. Kyselyn vastausprosentti (62 %) sekä osa tuloksista raportoitiin edeltävään tutkimukseen vertailemisen vuoksi vain sairaala-apteekkien ja itsenäisten julkisten lääkekeskusten osalta (n=29). Muut vastaajat (n=16) analysoitiin omana ryhmänään, mutta uusien kysymysten osalta raportoitiin yleisimmin kaikkien vastaajien (n=45) vastaukset yhdessä. Osastofarmasian ja kliinisen farmasian palveluita tuotti 82 % (n=37/45) kaikista vastaajista. Palveluiden avulla saavutettuja hyötyjä oli tutkinut 24 % (n=9/37) kaikista vastaajista, jotka tuottivat palveluja. Kyselyn tulosten perusteella osastofarmasian ja kliinisen farmasian henkilökunta oli vastaajaorganisaatioissa kasvanut vuosina 2017–2022, ja palveluita tarjottiin yhä laajemmin erilaisissa hoitoympäristöissä. Erityisesti palvelut olivat yleistyneet potilaita vastaanottavissa yksiköissä, kuten ensiavussa ja päivystyksessä, terveyskeskusten vastaanotoilla sekä poliklinikoilla, joissa työ painottuu lääkityksen ajantasaistamiseen. Työtehtävät olivat monipuolisia, ja kliinisten asiantuntijatehtävien osuus oli edelleen kasvanut. Järjestelmälähtöinen lääkitysturvallisuuden edistäminen sekä lääkehoitoprosessin kokonaisvaltainen kehittäminen näkyivät tehtävien jakaumassa. Eniten olivat yleistyneet eri tasoiset lääkityksen arvioinnit sekä lääkitysturvallisuusauditoinnit, kun vuonna 2016 eniten oli yleistynyt lääkitystiedon ajan-tasaistaminen. Tässä kyselyssä farmasian ammattilaisten osallistuminen potilaan kotiutusvaiheeseen oli vähentynyt. Lisäksi osastofarmaseuttien logististen tehtävien selvää vähenemistä ei vielä nähty huolimatta automaation, älylääkekaappien ja osastolääketyöntekijöiden yleistymisestä. Palveluiden avulla saavutetuista hyödyistä lääkehoidon arviointien lisääntymistä oli tutkittu eniten, ja lääkehoidon arviointiin liittyvät koulutukset olivat myös eniten suoritettuja täydennyskoulutuksia. Kliinisen farmasian palveluiden kohdentamista niistä eniten hyötyville potilaille tulisi edelleen kehittää, ja täydennyskoulutukseen käytettävää aikaa tulisi organisaatioissa lisätä. Osastofarmasian ja kliinisen farmasian palvelut ovat laajentuneet kotimaisten ja kansainvälisten suositusten mukaisesti ja keskittyvät yhä enemmän lääkitysturvallisuuden edistämiseen. Palvelut painottuvat tällä hetkellä erityisesti potilaita vastaanottaviin yksiköihin. Jatkossa kliinisen farmasian palveluita tulee kohdentaa enemmän myös potilaan kotiutusvaiheeseen, koska kansainvälisten tutkimusten mukaan se voisi olla erityisen kustannusvaikuttavaa.