Skip to main content
Login | Suomeksi | På svenska | In English

Browsing by Subject "tietokäsitykset"

Sort by: Order: Results:

  • Nurttila, Suvi (2014)
    In today's society it is desirable to be successful and continuously progressive. At the same time it is seen important to focus on one's well-being and seeking optimal experiences. In studying, the interaction between motivation and well-being as well as the importance of positive learning experiences is an actual entirety. Taking students conceptions of learning and knowledge into account brings in a richer perspective that has been less frequently studied. Conceptions of learning and knowledge, otherwise epistemologies, are crucial in governing student's ways of interpreting and evaluating information, as well as their view on the learning process. An important recent insight on the field of educational research is the growing idea that motivational, emotional and cognitive dimensions are not only intrinsically significant, but also in intense interaction with each other and with the learning environment. The aim of this study was to investigate what kinds of motivational factors and problems in well-being do novice students experience in their studies, and also what their epistemologies are like. The approach was person-oriented. Motivational factors were: experienced challenge and competence, thinking strategies and attributions, and study engagement. Problems in well-being were measured through emotional dimension (stress, exhaustion) on the one hand, and through motivational dimension (lack of interest, task avoidance) on the other. Epistemologies measured in this study were: collaborative knowledge building, reflective learning, metacognition, certainty of knowledge and practical value. The data (n=785) were collected in spring and autumn 2012 by using a questionnaire developed by RYM Indoor Environment project. The participants were first and second year students from Aalto university of Technology and four departments in University of Helsinki: Department of Teacher education, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Theology, and Faculty of Law. K-means cluster analysis was used for clustering students into homogenous groups that presented their experienced motivational factors. To see whether the groups differed in terms of problems in well-being or epistemologies, Oneway analysis of variance was conducted. Also potential differences in certain background variables were investigated by using crosstabs (gender, study discipline) and Kruskal-Wallis test (age). Three studying profiles were identified: 1) pessimistic, 2) bored, 3) engaged. Pessimistic students reported the lowest study engagement, optimism and competence and the highest task avoidance and problems in well-being. They valued certain knowledge the most. Bored students experienced the lowest challenge, quite low study engagement and moderate optimism, competence and lack of interest. They reported the lowest practical value of knowledge. Engaged students had the highest study engagement, optimism and competence, lowest task avoidance and the least problems in well-being. They valued collaborative knowledge building, reflective learning and metacognition the most. There were not found gender differences between the studying profiles. Instead, it turned out that pessimistic students were the youngest. When comparing different study disciplines, the results indicated that in the Department of Teacher education, as well as in the Faculties of Law and Theology, the largest section of participants was identified as engaged students. Among participants from Aalto university and the Department of Chemistry, the largest section was identified as pessimistic students. This study demonstrates the idea of the dynamic interplay between motivational, emotional and cognitive dimensions in studying. In conclusion, students personal motivational factors, well-being and epistemologies form unique entireties. It can be deduced on the basis of earlier research, that these entireties are of utmost importance regarding studying and can be either worthwhile or detrimental to it. In the future, more proof is needed about the concrete relations and potential effects on study success, for example, as supporting successful studying and graduating on schedule are topical politico-educational subjects in Finland. Also little is known about the relations between well-being and epistemologies. The results of this study could be utilized in developing and designing higher education.
  • Hiltunen, Aino (2020)
    Modern multi-locational work, growing complexity of work environments and diverse ways of organizing work have increased the significance of employees’ proactivity and self-initiative alongside with expectations of continuous learning and development. Previous studies have shown, however, that complex learning environments, such as workplaces, are not equally beneficial to all. Beliefs about knowledge and learning have been a popular interest in field of education. This line of studies have linked these conceptions, also referred to as epistemic be-liefs, to learning strategies, study performance and problem solving. These beliefs and concep-tions are less studied in the work context. The aim of this study is to examine whether beliefs about knowledge and learning are linked to job crafting. This study is based on a person-oriented approach by profiling participants to dif-ferent epistemic profiles. The profiles are formed based on participants’ theories of knowledge and learning operationalized as epistemic beliefs. The participants were from three medium-sized Finnish organizations. The organizations oper-ated in the public sector, two of them in the field of education and culture and one in technolo-gy. The data was collected using Organizational Renewal questionnaire. The material was part of the work of educational psychology research group in University of Helsinki (dissertation work of Terhi Nissinen). The group aims to understand the transformation of work within public sector. The second part of the survey was used in this study. The sample consisted of 194 staff members from the participant organizations. The profiles were formed using cluster analy-sis and the differences between profiles were examined by one-way analysis of variance. Three different epistemic profiles were found: 1) Collaboratives (32 %), 2) Moderates (36 %), and 3) Certainty-driven (32 %). Some significant differences were found in the ways the pro-files enacted with job crafting. Significant differences were found in three out of four re-searched dimensions of job crafting: increasing challenging job demands, increasing social job resources and increasing structural job resources. The collaboratives crafted their jobs the most in all these three dimensions, whereas the moderates crafted their jobs the least. Overall, the fourth dimension, decreasing hindering job demands, was not a popular crafting method within this sample, and there were no significant differences in this dimension between the dif-ferent profiles.